The ongoing Gaza conflict has once again laid bare the glaring shortcomings of international law in preventing atrocities and protecting civilians. From the use of disproportionate force to the targeting of civilian infrastructure, repeated violations of international humanitarian law (IHL) and human rights law have occurred with apparent impunity. Despite a robust framework of legal norms and conventions designed to shield non-combatants in times of war, the reality on the ground in Gaza tells a different story—a story of broken systems, failed enforcement mechanisms, and selective accountability.



This article examines how international law is failing in Gaza, why enforcement remains elusive, and what this means for the future of global justice. It also explores the political manipulation of legal norms, the paralysis of international institutions, and the dire need for reform.



---


I. The Legal Framework: Theory vs. Practice


The Geneva Conventions, ratified by nearly every nation in the world, form the cornerstone of international humanitarian law. They outline clear rules for the conduct of war, including the protection of civilians, the treatment of prisoners, and the obligations of occupying powers. Complementing these are various international treaties such as the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and human rights covenants including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).


Under these frameworks:


Civilians must not be targeted.


Humanitarian aid must be allowed to reach those in need.


Occupying powers have duties to protect the civilian population.


War crimes, including collective punishment and indiscriminate attacks, are prosecutable offenses.



Yet, despite the legal clarity, the situation in Gaza has repeatedly seen the rules ignored.



---


II. Gaza: A Repeated Theatre of Violations


Over the past two decades, Gaza has been the epicenter of repeated military operations, each marked by a high civilian death toll and widespread destruction. The 2008–2009 Operation Cast Lead, the 2014 Gaza War, the 2021 conflict, and the current war that began in 2023 have all resulted in significant violations of international law.


Civilian Casualties and Infrastructure Destruction


In the most recent escalation, thousands of Palestinian civilians have been killed, including women and children. Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, hospitals bombed, and UN schools sheltering displaced families targeted. The Israeli government claims it is acting in self-defense against Hamas rocket attacks. However, the principle of proportionality—a key tenet of IHL—requires that any military response must be proportionate to the threat and must not cause excessive harm to civilians relative to the anticipated military advantage.


Blockade and Collective Punishment


Gaza has been under a blockade by Israel (and to some extent Egypt) since 2007, restricting the movement of goods, services, and people. International legal experts, including those from the UN, have argued that this blockade amounts to collective punishment—prohibited under Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. It has crippled Gaza's economy, decimated its healthcare system, and left its population in a state of perpetual humanitarian crisis.



---


III. Impunity and the Failure of Accountability


Despite well-documented evidence of war crimes by both sides—Israeli forces and Palestinian armed groups—accountability has been virtually nonexistent.


International Criminal Court (ICC)


In 2021, the ICC launched an investigation into possible war crimes in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. However, progress has been slow, hampered by political pressure and limited jurisdiction. Israel is not a party to the Rome Statute and rejects the ICC's jurisdiction, while powerful states like the United States have actively opposed the Court's involvement, calling it biased.


This selective support for international justice mechanisms erodes their legitimacy. While leaders in weaker states are swiftly indicted and prosecuted (as seen in the cases of Sudan or the former Yugoslavia), those in powerful or allied nations often escape scrutiny. The result is a two-tiered system of justice—one for the powerful and another for the powerless.


United Nations Paralysis


The United Nations, particularly the Security Council, has repeatedly failed to take decisive action on Gaza due to the veto power held by its five permanent members. The U.S., a staunch ally of Israel, has used its veto to block resolutions calling for ceasefires, investigations, or condemnation of Israeli actions.


This has led to widespread disillusionment with the UN's ability to uphold international law impartially. Meanwhile, other international bodies like the UN Human Rights Council have issued reports and recommendations, but without enforcement power, these remain largely symbolic.



---


IV. The Politicization of International Law


One of the most troubling aspects of the Gaza conflict is how international law itself has become a political tool, invoked selectively to serve national interests. For instance, Western governments often emphasize Israel’s right to self-defense—a legitimate legal principle—but downplay or ignore the rights of Palestinians under occupation.


Self-Defense vs. Occupation


Under Article 51 of the UN Charter, nations have the right to self-defense. However, this does not absolve occupying powers of their responsibilities. Legal scholars argue that Israel, as the occupying power in Gaza (a designation contested by Israel but supported by the UN and ICJ due to its control over borders, airspace, and resources), has obligations that go beyond the right to defend itself.


The failure to balance these rights and duties reflects a skewed application of international law. Palestinians are left without a viable mechanism to seek justice, while Israel continues operations with diplomatic cover.



---


V. The Human Cost of Legal Inaction


The human toll of the Gaza conflict cannot be overstated. Beyond the immediate death and destruction, the psychological, social, and economic impacts are profound and long-lasting. Generations of children have grown up amid trauma, poverty, and instability. The failure of the international legal system to provide protection or redress compounds this suffering.


Humanitarian Aid Obstruction


Numerous aid agencies have reported that access to Gaza is restricted, even during humanitarian pauses. The targeting of medical facilities and aid convoys has further aggravated the crisis. Under IHL, the obstruction of humanitarian assistance in conflict zones constitutes a war crime. Yet, such actions have not led to accountability.


Targeting of Journalists and Medical Personnel


International law grants special protections to journalists and medical workers in conflict zones. Despite this, dozens of journalists and healthcare workers have been killed in Gaza. Such acts not only violate IHL but also undermine transparency and the ability to document human rights abuses.



---


VI. Is Reform Possible?


Given the repeated failures of enforcement and the growing perception of international law as biased or impotent, calls for reform are mounting.


Strengthening Enforcement Mechanisms


There is a need to bolster the authority and independence of institutions like the ICC. States must stop shielding allies from accountability and must support investigations regardless of political affiliations.


Decentralized Accountability Models


Some experts propose national courts exercising universal jurisdiction—where states can prosecute war crimes committed abroad—as a way to bypass the paralysis of international institutions. For example, German courts have tried Syrian officials for crimes committed during that country’s civil war.


Civil Society and Public Pressure


Grassroots movements, human rights organizations, and international NGOs play a critical role in documenting abuses and applying pressure for accountability. While not a substitute for formal legal mechanisms, they help keep the issue in the public eye and foster global solidarity.



---


VII. Conclusion: A Crisis of Legitimacy


The Gaza conflict represents not just a humanitarian and geopolitical crisis but a legal and moral one. International law, conceived in the aftermath of world wars to prevent future atrocities, is being tested—and found wanting. The inability or unwillingness of the international community to enforce its own laws in Gaza has not only deepened Palestinian suffering but has also eroded faith in the global legal order.


If international law is to retain its legitimacy, it must apply equally to all, irrespective of power, politics, or geography. The people of Gaza—and indeed the world—deserve a system that works not only in treaties and courtrooms but in practice, on the ground, where lives hang in the balance.


Until then, international law will remain a noble ideal—broken, battered, and tragically ineffective in the face of human suffering.



---


References


1. Geneva Conventions (1949)



2. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court



3. UN Reports on Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories



4. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International reports on Gaza conflicts



5. Legal analysis from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)



6. Statements and proceedings of the International Criminal Court



7. UN Security Council Resolutions and Voting Records



8. Reports from Médecins Sans Frontières, Oxfam, and UNRWA